The Trump Administration’s stated goals to “streamline” permitting and “modernize” regulations came to historic preservation and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has initiated the first comprehensive review of the Section 106 regulations in over two decades. At their business meeting on February 12, the ACHP established the goal of this effort will be “to consider how the Section 106 regulations might be modified, clarified, or streamlined to better accomplish the statutory objectives and requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA).” Chairman Voyles called for the Council to move “without delay” and requested the council members provide feedback by February 27, 2026.
We encourage preservation leaders to prepare a record of evidence-based solutions for the ACHP task force. With the ACHP merging its Tribal and Preservation offices due to staff cuts (now the Office of External Engagement), there are concerns about the Council’s capacity to handle the heavy consultation load required for these changes. Additionally, nine of the ACHP members have been in place for only about a month. Active engagement from potentially impacted communities, local governments, tribal governments, CRM consultants, and preservation advocates is absolutely critical to inform this process and to build a strong administrative record to support federal decision making. We prepared and sent Chairman Voyle comments which you can read below.
The Trump administration is threatening America’s historic and cultural heritage—and we must act immediately.
On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order Declaring a National Energy Emergency (EO)—a manufactured crisis designed to bypass critical permitting reviews. Under this EO, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation is directing federal agencies to sidestep Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, a cornerstone of preservation law that has safeguarded our tribal, community, and national heritage for decades.
This order means that agencies can suspend consideration of historic properties for any project an agency claims is related to energy production—regardless of its actual necessity. We are concerned that agencies will fast-track projects without public input, meaningful consultation with Tribes, or any obligation to avoid or mitigate damage to historic sites, sacred places, and cultural landscapes. If left unchallenged, these directives could result in irreversible destruction to the places that define our history and identity.
Law & Crime
"Prodded onto the shakiest of limbs:’ States sue Trump over ‘fake’ energy emergency he declared in ‘unsupported and unlawful’ executive order, suit says”
by Chris Perez (May 11, 2025)
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
"As Line 5 tunnel set to be fast-tracked, Great Lakes tribes withdraw from cooperating on environmental review”
by Caitlin Looby (March 24, 2025)
CT News Junkie
"Attorney: Trump’s Executive Order Threatens Future of Nation’s Historic And Cultural Sites”
by Brian Scott-Smith (March 22, 2025)
Times-Standard
"Trump administration’s EO may result in roll back of historic preservation efforts”
by Robert Schaulis (March 10, 2025)
New York Times
"The Words Federal Agencies Are Discouraged From Using Under Trump”
by Karen Yourish, Annie Daniel, Saurabh Datar, Isaac White and Lazaro Gamio (March 7, 2025)
Media Contact
