The EEOB is a National Historic Landmark and defining element of the White House complex.
On Wednesday, November 12, 2025, President Donald J. Trump revealed his plans to “beautify” the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) by painting its every exterior surface white. The proposal would permanently alter one of the most architecturally significant and historic structures in the Nation’s Capital.
With a dramatic exterior crafted in polished granite, slate, and ornate cast-iron trim, the EEOB is a National Historic Landmark and a defining element of the surrounds of the White House. The building houses approximately 1,500 employees who work for the Executive Offices of the President and Vice President.
Forty-eight hours after the President’s announcement, Cultural Heritage Partners and the DC Preservation League filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking emergency relief to ensure that the project complies with the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and other federal laws designed to protect nationally significant historic resources.
The litigation has evolved far beyond the President’s initial proposal to paint the building.
On January 29, 2026, the General Services Administration (GSA) and the White House Office of Administration (OA) executed a Memorandum of Understanding purporting to transfer responsibility for the EEOB project from GSA to the OA. The government now argues that because the Office of Administration is part of the Executive Office of the President, it is not subject to the National Historic Preservation Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, or judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Following a February 6 hearing, the Court permitted Plaintiffs to amend their complaint, which they filed on February 19, 2026.
Since then, however, the White House has begun moving the project forward. The Office of Administration has appeared before the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts and the National Capital Planning Commission, retained consultants, and initiated physical testing on the EEOB’s historic granite façade to determine whether and how the building can be painted. Those activities prompted Plaintiffs to return to court seeking a preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo while the Court decides whether the White House may lawfully proceed outside the federal preservation and environmental review process.
The case now presents questions that reach well beyond the future appearance of a single historic building.
Among the issues before the Court are:
The EEOB case is about much more than the color of a historic building.
If the government’s legal theory is accepted, it could provide a roadmap for future administrations to sidestep longstanding federal preservation and environmental laws whenever the White House chooses to direct a project itself. The outcome therefore has implications not only for the EEOB, but also for how historic federal buildings, landscapes, and other nationally significant resources are protected across the country.
daily Kos
"Anotherday, another Trump desecration of DC’"
By Lisa Needham (July 30, 2026)
people
"Preservationists Move to Stop Trump from Testing New Paint on Iconic 1800s Landmark He Called ‘Ugly’"
By Angelique Brenes (July 30, 2026)
CNN Politics
"The Trump admin wants to test paint patches on an iconic DC building this week. Preservationists are trying to stop it."”
by Sunlen Serfaty (July 29, 2026)
The Washington Post
"Trump’s plan to paint the Eisenhower is about more than damaging stone"
by Philip Kennicott (July 24, 2026)
Previous Press Coverage
"All press coverage of the lawsuit"
Key Documents
Media Contact